Does EU Inc fit the situation

Six questions, scored against the five non-negotiables. The result is a neutral read: incorporate, migrate, wait, or keep the current structure, including when the answer is to do nothing.

1 / 6

Where is capital raised

Primarily from US investors US VCs, US-led rounds Primarily European investors EU seed and growth funds Mixed, pan-European and international A blend of both Not raising, or bootstrapped No external capital planned

Where the company operates and hires

One country only Single market, single payroll Two to three EU countries Expanding beyond the home market Three or more EU countries A genuinely pan-European team

The company’s current state

No company yet Idea or pre-incorporation Incorporated as a SAS French société par actions simplifiée Incorporated as a GmbH or UG German company Incorporated under another national form Ltd, BV, SL, and similar A US or Delaware entity Already a C-Corp

Employee stock options

Yes, internationally Hires in multiple countries Yes, single-country hires Everyone in one market Not now No ESOP planned

The realistic exit path

US acquisition or IPO US-centric outcome European acquisition or IPO EU-centric outcome Too early to know No clear path yet

Cross-border friction today

Significant Multiple entities, registrations and payrolls across borders Some Some cross-border complexity, but manageable None Fully single-market today

EU Inc Foundry

A neutral reference on the EU's proposed 28th corporate regime.

Site

Home
Guides
Free diagnostic

Guides

What is the 28th regime
EU Inc vs Delaware
The central registry

© 2026 EU Inc Foundry. Not affiliated with the European Commission or the EU–INC coalition. This site is informational and does not constitute legal or tax advice. EU Inc is a proposed regime under negotiation; features and timeline may change. "EU Inc Foundry" is a working name.